Namibia vs Suriname: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Namibia
46.23
in 2019
Suriname
34.17
in 2019
Namibia rank
178th
Suriname rank
180th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Namibia
  • Suriname
01020304050200320112019

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 46.23 against 34.17 in Suriname, a difference of 12.06.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 178th and Suriname ranks 180th of 188 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 15.88 0 15.88 Namibia
2010s 37.79 16.88 20.9 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Namibia or Suriname?
Namibia, at 46.23 against 34.17 in Suriname as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Namibia and Suriname?
12.06, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Suriname?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Namibia and Suriname rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Namibia ranks 178th and Suriname ranks 180th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.