Philippines vs Seychelles: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score

Philippines
67.34
in 2019
Seychelles
68.34
in 2019
Philippines rank
159th
Seychelles rank
157th

Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time

  • Philippines
  • Seychelles
020406080200320112019

How they compare

Seychelles currently reports 68.34 against 67.34 in Philippines, a difference of 1.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.

Philippines ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 157th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Seychelles Difference Ahead
2000s 65.73 67.34 1.61 Seychelles
2010s 70.85 68.04 2.81 Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Philippines or Seychelles?
Seychelles, at 68.34 against 67.34 in Philippines as of 2019.
What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Philippines and Seychelles?
1, with Seychelles ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Seychelles?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Philippines and Seychelles rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
Philippines ranks 159th and Seychelles ranks 157th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,083 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.