Russian Federation vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Russian Federation
90.35
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
89.95
in 2019
Russian Federation rank
83rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
84th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Russian Federation
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 90.35 against 89.95 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.4.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 191 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.36 | 52.66 | 18.69 | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 85.24 | 78.34 | 6.89 | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Russian Federation or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Russian Federation, at 90.35 against 89.95 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.4, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Russian Federation and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Russian Federation ranks 83rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.