Seychelles vs United Republic of Tanzania: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Seychelles
68.34
in 2019
United Republic of Tanzania
70.85
in 2019
Seychelles rank
159th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
157th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Seychelles
- United Republic of Tanzania
How they compare
United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 70.85 against 68.34 in Seychelles, a difference of 2.51.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Seychelles ahead.
Seychelles ranks 159th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 157th of 190 countries.
United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Seychelles | United Republic of Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.34 | 67.74 | 0.402 | United Republic of Tanzania |
| 2010s | 68.04 | 71.06 | 3.02 | United Republic of Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Seychelles or United Republic of Tanzania?
- United Republic of Tanzania, at 70.85 against 68.34 in Seychelles as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Seychelles and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 2.51, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Seychelles and United Republic of Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Seychelles and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Seychelles ranks 159th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 157th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.