Tanzania, United Republic of vs Zimbabwe: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
Tanzania, United Republic of
70.85
in 2019
Zimbabwe
73.37
in 2019
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
157th
Zimbabwe rank
155th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- Tanzania, United Republic of
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 73.37 against 70.85 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 2.52.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 190 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania, United Republic of | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.76 | 5.17 | 61.59 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 71.06 | 25.63 | 45.43 | Tanzania, United Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, Tanzania, United Republic of or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 73.37 against 70.85 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 2.52, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Tanzania, United Republic of and Zimbabwe rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 157th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.