United Arab Emirates vs Uzbekistan: Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score
United Arab Emirates
96.98
in 2019
Uzbekistan
97.49
in 2019
United Arab Emirates rank
10th
Uzbekistan rank
8th
Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score over time
- United Arab Emirates
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 97.49 against 96.98 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.51.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.
United Arab Emirates ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, United Arab Emirates averaged higher in 1 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | United Arab Emirates | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.27 | 78.39 | 3.88 | United Arab Emirates |
| 2010s | 92.16 | 92.96 | 0.804 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - men (days) - score, United Arab Emirates or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 97.49 against 96.98 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - men (days) - score between United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan?
- 0.51, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do United Arab Emirates and Uzbekistan rank globally for starting a business: time - men (days) - score?
- United Arab Emirates ranks 10th and Uzbekistan ranks 8th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Men (days) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for men benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.