Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Fiji: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
60.8
in 2019
Fiji
60.3
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
170th
Fiji rank
171st
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Fiji
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 60.8 against 60.3 in Fiji, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Fiji ahead.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 170th and Fiji ranks 171st of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 1 and Fiji in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Fiji | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48.38 | 60.01 | 11.63 | Fiji |
| 2010s | 54.37 | 52.26 | 2.11 | Bolivia, Plurinational State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Fiji?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 60.8 against 60.3 in Fiji as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Fiji?
- 0.5, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Fiji?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Fiji rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 170th and Fiji ranks 171st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.