Botswana vs Congo, Republic of: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Botswana
52.26
in 2019
Congo, Republic of
50.25
in 2019
Botswana rank
176th
Congo, Republic of rank
179th
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Botswana
- Congo, Republic of
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 52.26 against 50.25 in Congo, Republic of, a difference of 2.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo, Republic of ahead.
Botswana ranks 176th and Congo, Republic of ranks 179th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Congo, Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Congo, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.62 | 44.22 | 34.6 | Congo, Republic of |
| 2010s | 53.47 | 29.95 | 23.52 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Botswana or Congo, Republic of?
- Botswana, at 52.26 against 50.25 in Congo, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Botswana and Congo, Republic of?
- 2.01, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Congo, Republic of?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Congo, Republic of rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Botswana ranks 176th and Congo, Republic of ranks 179th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.