Democratic Republic of Congo vs Turkey: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Democratic Republic of Congo
93.47
in 2019
Turkey
93.47
in 2019
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
45th
Turkey rank
45th
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Turkey
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 93.47 against 93.47 in Turkey, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Turkey ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 45th and Turkey ranks 45th of 191 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 85.71 | 85.71 | Turkey |
| 2010s | 69.95 | 90.65 | 20.7 | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Democratic Republic of Congo or Turkey?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 93.47 against 93.47 in Turkey as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Democratic Republic of Congo and Turkey?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Turkey?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Turkey rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 45th and Turkey ranks 45th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.