Micronesia, Federated States of vs Tonga: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Micronesia, Federated States of
84.42
in 2019
Tonga
84.42
in 2019
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
118th
Tonga rank
118th
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Micronesia, Federated States of
- Tonga
How they compare
Micronesia, Federated States of currently reports 84.42 against 84.42 in Tonga, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tonga ahead.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 118th and Tonga ranks 118th of 191 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia, Federated States of | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.55 | 70.35 | 11.2 | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2010s | 84.42 | 83.52 | 0.9045 | Micronesia, Federated States of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Micronesia, Federated States of or Tonga?
- Micronesia, Federated States of, at 84.42 against 84.42 in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Micronesia, Federated States of and Tonga?
- 0, with Micronesia, Federated States of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia, Federated States of and Tonga?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia, Federated States of and Tonga rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 118th and Tonga ranks 118th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.