Qatar vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Qatar
90.95
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
90.45
in 2019
Qatar rank
74th
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
75th
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Qatar
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 90.95 against 90.45 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Qatar ahead.
Qatar ranks 74th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 75th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Qatar averaged higher in 1 and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.46 | 88.78 | 2.68 | Qatar |
| 2010s | 90.05 | 90.45 | 0.402 | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Qatar or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Qatar, at 90.95 against 90.45 in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.5, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
- How do Qatar and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Qatar ranks 74th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 75th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.