Saudi Arabia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score
Saudi Arabia
89.45
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
89.95
in 2019
Saudi Arabia rank
84th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
83rd
Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 89.95 against 89.45 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 84th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.99 | 52.66 | 5.33 | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 77.54 | 78.34 | 0.804 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher starting a business: time - women (days)- score, Saudi Arabia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 89.95 against 89.45 in Saudi Arabia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in starting a business: time - women (days)- score between Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.5, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for starting a business: time - women (days)- score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 84th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Starting a business: Time - Women (days)- Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for women benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.