Finland vs Japan: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products over time
- Finland
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 2.0% against 1.9% in Finland, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 142nd and Japan ranks 141st of 184 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 10.0% | 4.5% | 5.4% | Finland |
| 1990s | 10.2% | 4.0% | 6.2% | Finland |
| 2000s | 2.8% | 4.2% | 1.4% | Japan |
| 2010s | 2.5% | 3.8% | 1.3% | Japan |
| 2020s | 2.0% | 2.2% | 0.2% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products, Finland or Japan?
- Japan, at 2.0% against 1.9% in Finland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products between Finland and Japan?
- 0.1%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Japan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2022.
- How do Finland and Japan rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products?
- Finland ranks 142nd and Japan ranks 141st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs.