Guinea vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products over time
- Guinea
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 12.9% against 12.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Guinea ranks 27th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.2% | 21.3% | 15.1% | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2000s | 13.6% | 13.0% | 0.6% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 12.7% | 0.5% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 13.1% | 12.3% | 0.7% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products, Guinea or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Guinea, at 12.9% against 12.8% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products between Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.1%, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2022.
- How do Guinea and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products?
- Guinea ranks 27th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 30th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs.