Antigua and Barbuda vs Suriname: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Suriname
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 16.1% against 15.8% in Suriname, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Suriname ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Suriname ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 24.1% | 24.0% | 0.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 16.8% | 19.4% | 2.6% | Suriname |
| 2010s | 18.2% | 16.5% | 1.7% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2020s | 16.1% | 16.3% | 0.2% | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Antigua and Barbuda or Suriname?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 16.1% against 15.8% in Suriname as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname?
- 0.3%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Suriname rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 48th and Suriname ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).