Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Central African Republic
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 25.5% against 24.6% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.0% | 23.2% | 1.3% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 25.5% | 24.6% | 0.8% | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
- Central African Republic, at 25.5% against 24.6% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.9%, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Central African Republic ranks 5th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).