Chad vs Equatorial Guinea, Republic of: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Chad
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of currently reports 24.6% against 24.1% in Chad, a difference of 0.5%.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 8th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 6th of 184 countries.
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.9% | 23.2% | 1.3% | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of |
| 2020s | 24.1% | 24.6% | 0.5% | Equatorial Guinea, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Chad or Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, at 24.6% against 24.1% in Chad as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Chad and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 0.5%, with Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Chad and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Chad ranks 8th and Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 6th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).