Guinea-Bissau vs Papua New Guinea: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 17.2% against 17.1% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 37th and Papua New Guinea ranks 38th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.5% | 17.2% | 1.7% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 16.4% | 32.9% | 16.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 16.8% | 17.7% | 1.0% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Guinea-Bissau or Papua New Guinea?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 17.2% against 17.1% in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Papua New Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 37th and Papua New Guinea ranks 38th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).