Guinea vs Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Guinea
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 17.9% against 17.3% in Guinea, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
Guinea ranks 36th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 33rd of 184 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.4% | 16.2% | 1.2% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 17.8% | 16.8% | 1.0% | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Guinea or Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 17.9% against 17.3% in Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 0.6%, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
- How do Guinea and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Guinea ranks 36th and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 33rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).