Panama vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products over time
- Panama
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Panama currently reports 11.1% against 10.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Panama ranks 74th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 77th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.9% | 21.5% | 9.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 11.8% | 15.4% | 3.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 13.7% | 2.8% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 11.7% | 10.9% | 0.9% | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products, Panama or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Panama, at 11.1% against 10.9% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products between Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
- How do Panama and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products?
- Panama ranks 74th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 77th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, simple mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Simple mean applied tariff is the unweighted average of effectively applied rates for all products subject to tariffs calculated for all traded goods. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of simple mean tariffs. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).