Afghanistan vs Republic of Korea: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Afghanistan
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 5.7% against 5.6% in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 76th and Republic of Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.2% | 8.0% | 1.9% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 5.5% | 6.8% | 1.2% | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Afghanistan or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 5.7% against 5.6% in Afghanistan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Afghanistan and Republic of Korea?
- 0.1%, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Republic of Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Afghanistan and Republic of Korea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Afghanistan ranks 76th and Republic of Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.