Antigua and Barbuda vs Grenada: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Grenada
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 13.1% against 13.0% in Grenada, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 17th and Grenada ranks 18th of 184 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.5% | 17.4% | 4.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2000s | 13.1% | 11.2% | 1.9% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 12.4% | 11.1% | 1.3% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Antigua and Barbuda or Grenada?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 13.1% against 13.0% in Grenada as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada?
- 0.1%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Grenada rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 17th and Grenada ranks 18th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.