Azerbaijan vs French Polynesia: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Azerbaijan
- French Polynesia
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 5.8% against 5.5% in Azerbaijan, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes French Polynesia's figure about 1.1 times Azerbaijan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2008 it was French Polynesia ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 77th and French Polynesia ranks 74th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 2 and French Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 4.1% | 0.0% | French Polynesia |
| 2010s | 6.0% | 4.3% | 1.7% | Azerbaijan |
| 2020s | 6.0% | 5.3% | 0.7% | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Azerbaijan or French Polynesia?
- French Polynesia, at 5.8% against 5.5% in Azerbaijan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Azerbaijan and French Polynesia?
- 0.3%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and French Polynesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do Azerbaijan and French Polynesia rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Azerbaijan ranks 77th and French Polynesia ranks 74th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.