Bahrain vs Papua New Guinea: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Bahrain
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports 3.7% against 3.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Bahrain ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.7% | 15.7% | 4.9% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2000s | 6.0% | 2.5% | 3.5% | Bahrain |
| 2010s | 4.0% | 4.0% | 0.1% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 3.6% | 1.6% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Bahrain or Papua New Guinea?
- Bahrain, at 3.7% against 3.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Bahrain and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.1%, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Papua New Guinea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2021.
- How do Bahrain and Papua New Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Bahrain ranks 101st and Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.