Barbados vs Central African Republic: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Barbados
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 14.6% against 14.5% in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 12th and Central African Republic ranks 13th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Central African Republic in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.6% | 23.3% | 5.7% | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 12.9% | 16.2% | 3.3% | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 14.6% | 14.5% | 0.1% | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Barbados or Central African Republic?
- Barbados, at 14.6% against 14.5% in Central African Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Barbados and Central African Republic?
- 0.1%, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Central African Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Barbados and Central African Republic rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Barbados ranks 12th and Central African Republic ranks 13th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.