Bolivia vs Saudi Arabia: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%) over time
- Bolivia
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 5.4% against 5.1% in Bolivia, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 81st and Saudi Arabia ranks 78th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.5% | 11.1% | 1.6% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 6.2% | 6.3% | 0.0% | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 4.6% | 4.0% | 0.6% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 5.1% | 4.8% | 0.3% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Bolivia or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 5.4% against 5.1% in Bolivia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Bolivia and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.3%, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Saudi Arabia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
- How do Bolivia and Saudi Arabia rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Bolivia ranks 81st and Saudi Arabia ranks 78th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.