Brunei Darussalam vs Georgia: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Georgia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.4% against 0.0% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Georgia's figure about 42.0 times Brunei Darussalam's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Georgia ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 180th and Georgia ranks 178th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 2 and Georgia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.3% | 10.1% | 3.8% | Georgia |
| 2000s | 6.6% | 5.9% | 0.6% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.7% | 0.7% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Brunei Darussalam or Georgia?
- Georgia, at 0.4% against 0.0% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Brunei Darussalam and Georgia?
- 0.4%, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Georgia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Georgia rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 180th and Georgia ranks 178th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.