Burundi vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Burundi
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 9.0% against 8.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Burundi ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.6% | 13.5% | 0.1% | Burundi |
| 2010s | 6.8% | 14.3% | 7.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 11.3% | 8.8% | 2.5% | Burundi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Burundi or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Burundi, at 9.0% against 8.8% in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0.2%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Burundi and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Burundi ranks 48th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 51st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.