Cape Verde vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Cape Verde
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 12.6% against 12.1% in Iran, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 22nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 24th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Iran, Islamic Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.2% | 15.9% | 3.7% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 10.9% | 15.3% | 4.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2020s | 12.2% | 12.1% | 0.1% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Cape Verde or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Cape Verde, at 12.6% against 12.1% in Iran, Islamic Republic of as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Cape Verde and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.5%, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Cape Verde and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Cape Verde ranks 22nd and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 24th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.