Democratic Republic of Congo vs Tanzania: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%)
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 8.6% against 8.4% in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.7% | 7.9% | 3.8% | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2010s | 10.7% | 8.6% | 2.1% | Democratic Republic of Congo |
| 2020s | 8.4% | 8.9% | 0.5% | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Democratic Republic of Congo or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 8.6% against 8.4% in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
- 0.2%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Tanzania rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 55th and Tanzania ranks 54th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.