Cuba vs Syrian Arab Republic: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Cuba
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 9.2% against 9.2% in Cuba, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Cuba ranks 46th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 44th of 184 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Syrian Arab Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.0% | 10.9% | 1.9% | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2010s | 8.3% | 10.7% | 2.4% | Syrian Arab Republic |
| 2020s | 8.8% | 9.2% | 0.4% | Syrian Arab Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Cuba or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 9.2% against 9.2% in Cuba as of 2020.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 0.0%, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Cuba ranks 46th and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 44th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.