French Polynesia vs Republic of Korea: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- French Polynesia
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 5.8% against 5.7% in Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 74th and Republic of Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.1% | 8.0% | 3.9% | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 4.6% | 6.6% | 2.1% | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 5.3% | 5.2% | 0.1% | French Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, French Polynesia or Republic of Korea?
- French Polynesia, at 5.8% against 5.7% in Republic of Korea as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between French Polynesia and Republic of Korea?
- 0.1%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Republic of Korea?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
- How do French Polynesia and Republic of Korea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- French Polynesia ranks 74th and Republic of Korea ranks 75th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.