Georgia vs Peru: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Georgia
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.7% against 0.4% in Georgia, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.6 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Peru ahead.
Georgia ranks 178th and Peru ranks 176th of 184 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.1% | 12.7% | 2.5% | Peru |
| 2000s | 5.9% | 6.9% | 1.0% | Peru |
| 2010s | 0.6% | 1.8% | 1.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 0.3% | 0.7% | 0.3% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Georgia or Peru?
- Peru, at 0.7% against 0.4% in Georgia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Georgia and Peru?
- 0.3%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Peru?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Georgia and Peru rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Georgia ranks 178th and Peru ranks 176th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.