Guinea-Bissau vs Iran, Islamic Republic of: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Iran, Islamic Republic of
How they compare
Iran, Islamic Republic of currently reports 12.1% against 11.7% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 24th of 184 countries.
Iran, Islamic Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Iran, Islamic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.2% | 15.6% | 2.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2010s | 11.2% | 15.3% | 4.1% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
| 2020s | 11.7% | 12.1% | 0.4% | Iran, Islamic Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Guinea-Bissau or Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- Iran, Islamic Republic of, at 12.1% against 11.7% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Guinea-Bissau and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 0.4%, with Iran, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Iran, Islamic Republic of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Iran, Islamic Republic of rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Iran, Islamic Republic of ranks 24th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.