Indonesia vs Philippines: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Indonesia
- Philippines
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 1.8% against 1.8% in Philippines, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1989 it was Philippines ahead.
Indonesia ranks 131st and Philippines ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 14.5% | 22.5% | 8.0% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 10.4% | 10.5% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 3.8% | 3.2% | 0.6% | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 2.3% | 2.4% | 0.1% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1.9% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Indonesia or Philippines?
- Indonesia, at 1.8% against 1.8% in Philippines as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Indonesia and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Philippines?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1989 to 2022.
- How do Indonesia and Philippines rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Indonesia ranks 131st and Philippines ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.