Mozambique vs Russian Federation: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Mozambique
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 4.2% against 4.2% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Mozambique ahead.
Mozambique ranks 92nd and Russian Federation ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.9% | 9.3% | 1.4% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 4.8% | 5.3% | 0.5% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 4.2% | 4.1% | 0.0% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Mozambique or Russian Federation?
- Mozambique, at 4.2% against 4.2% in Russian Federation as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Mozambique and Russian Federation?
- 0.0%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Russian Federation?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Mozambique and Russian Federation rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Mozambique ranks 92nd and Russian Federation ranks 93rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.