North Macedonia vs Timor-Leste: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- North Macedonia
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 2.5% against 2.3% in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 120th and Timor-Leste ranks 118th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.1% | 2.5% | 0.6% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 2.5% | 0.5% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, North Macedonia or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 2.5% against 2.3% in North Macedonia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between North Macedonia and Timor-Leste?
- 0.2%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Timor-Leste?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2021.
- How do North Macedonia and Timor-Leste rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- North Macedonia ranks 120th and Timor-Leste ranks 118th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.