Pakistan vs Trinidad and Tobago: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Pakistan
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 7.6% against 7.5% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.1% | 17.9% | 5.3% | Pakistan |
| 2000s | 14.4% | 8.5% | 5.9% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 9.4% | 8.6% | 0.8% | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 8.3% | 8.2% | 0.1% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Pakistan or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Pakistan, at 7.6% against 7.5% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.1%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2022.
- How do Pakistan and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Pakistan ranks 62nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.