Papua New Guinea vs Thailand: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 3.7% against 3.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Thailand ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd and Thailand ranks 100th of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.7% | 33.5% | 17.8% | Thailand |
| 2000s | 2.4% | 6.1% | 3.7% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 2.6% | 5.5% | 2.9% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 3.6% | 3.1% | 0.4% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products, Papua New Guinea or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 3.7% against 3.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products between Papua New Guinea and Thailand?
- 0.1%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Thailand?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2021.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Thailand rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 103rd and Thailand ranks 100th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, all products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead.