Brazil vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products

Brazil
8.7%
in 2022
Congo, Democratic Republic of the
8.4%
in 2020
Brazil rank
51st
Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank
54th

Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products over time

  • Brazil
  • Congo, Democratic Republic of the
10203040198920052022

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 8.7% against 8.4% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.

Brazil ranks 51st and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 54th of 184 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Congo, Democratic Republic of the in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Congo, Democratic Republic of the Difference Ahead
2000s 9.7% 12.0% 2.3% Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2010s 9.8% 10.7% 0.9% Congo, Democratic Republic of the
2020s 9.6% 8.4% 1.2% Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products, Brazil or Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
Brazil, at 8.7% against 8.4% in Congo, Democratic Republic of the as of 2022.
What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products between Brazil and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
0.3%, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo, Democratic Republic of the?
9 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Congo, Democratic Republic of the rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products?
Brazil ranks 51st and Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 54th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products. Statizoid, drawing on Staff estimates. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tariff-rate-applied-weighted-mean-manufactured-products-percent/brazil/congo-dem-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://private-sector.statizoid.com/compare/tariff-rate-applied-weighted-mean-manufactured-products-percent/brazil/congo-dem-rep/">Brazil vs Congo, Democratic Republic of the: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%)
Unit
%
Source
Staff estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
185 places, 3,798 data points, 1988–2022
Last refreshed

Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.