Congo vs Equatorial Guinea: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products over time
- Congo
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 17.9% against 16.3% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Congo ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.4% | 14.0% | 1.6% | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 17.9% | 16.3% | 1.6% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products, Congo or Equatorial Guinea?
- Congo, at 17.9% against 16.3% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products between Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.6%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Equatorial Guinea?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
- How do Congo and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products?
- Congo ranks 4th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 6th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, manufactured products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Manufactured products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 5-8 excluding division 68.