Angola vs Trinidad and Tobago: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Angola
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 10.8% against 9.8% in Angola, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 184 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.8% | 4.4% | 9.4% | Angola |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 8.1% | 6.1% | Angola |
| 2020s | 15.0% | 13.2% | 1.8% | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Angola or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 10.8% against 9.8% in Angola as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Angola and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.0%, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2022.
- How do Angola and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Angola ranks 44th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 41st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).