Antigua and Barbuda vs Uganda: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 14.2% against 13.9% in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Uganda ranks 27th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.8% | 8.0% | 4.8% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 12.3% | 1.5% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 13.9% | 13.3% | 0.6% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Antigua and Barbuda or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 14.2% against 13.9% in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda?
- 0.3%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2021.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Uganda rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 30th and Uganda ranks 27th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).