Belarus vs Colombia: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 2.4% against 2.3% in Colombia, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Colombia ahead.
Belarus ranks 121st and Colombia ranks 124th of 184 countries.
Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6.7% | 12.4% | 5.6% | Colombia |
| 2000s | 4.1% | 10.9% | 6.8% | Colombia |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 5.3% | 3.8% | Colombia |
| 2020s | 1.7% | 2.3% | 0.6% | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Belarus or Colombia?
- Belarus, at 2.4% against 2.3% in Colombia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Belarus and Colombia?
- 0.1%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Belarus ranks 121st and Colombia ranks 124th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).