Bhutan vs Madagascar: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Bhutan
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 6.6% against 6.2% in Bhutan, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 75th and Madagascar ranks 73rd of 184 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 2 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.7% | 1.7% | 8.0% | Bhutan |
| 2000s | 24.6% | 3.6% | 21.0% | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 2.9% | 7.9% | 5.1% | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 4.1% | 6.5% | 2.4% | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Bhutan or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 6.6% against 6.2% in Bhutan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Bhutan and Madagascar?
- 0.4%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Madagascar?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2022.
- How do Bhutan and Madagascar rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Bhutan ranks 75th and Madagascar ranks 73rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).