Botswana vs Papua New Guinea: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Botswana
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 7.7% against 7.7% in Botswana, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 67th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 184 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5% | 4.0% | 3.5% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 9.9% | 9.2% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 1.6% | 7.8% | 6.2% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Botswana or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 7.7% against 7.7% in Botswana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Botswana and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.0%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2021.
- How do Botswana and Papua New Guinea rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Botswana ranks 67th and Papua New Guinea ranks 65th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).