Cabo Verde vs Grenada: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Cabo Verde
- Grenada
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 14.7% against 14.0% in Grenada, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 26th and Grenada ranks 29th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.0% | 9.9% | 3.1% | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 11.6% | 11.6% | 0.1% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 14.7% | 14.0% | 0.7% | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Cabo Verde or Grenada?
- Cabo Verde, at 14.7% against 14.0% in Grenada as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Cabo Verde and Grenada?
- 0.7%, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Grenada?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Cabo Verde and Grenada rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Cabo Verde ranks 26th and Grenada ranks 29th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).