Cape Verde vs Guinea-Bissau: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Cape Verde
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 15.0% against 14.7% in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 26th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.1% | 12.1% | 1.0% | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 11.6% | 12.4% | 0.8% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 15.0% | 13.8% | 1.2% | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Cape Verde or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 15.0% against 14.7% in Cape Verde as of 2022.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.3%, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2022.
- How do Cape Verde and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Cape Verde ranks 26th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).