Djibouti vs Guyana: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products over time
- Djibouti
- Guyana
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 14.1% against 13.4% in Guyana, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 28th and Guyana ranks 31st of 184 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 534.8% | 14.7% | 520.0% | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 18.4% | 11.0% | 7.5% | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 13.7% | 6.9% | 6.8% | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Djibouti or Guyana?
- Djibouti, at 14.1% against 13.4% in Guyana as of 2014.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Djibouti and Guyana?
- 0.7%, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Guyana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Djibouti and Guyana rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Djibouti ranks 28th and Guyana ranks 31st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).