Guinea-Bissau vs Nauru: Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%)
Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%) over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 16.0% against 15.0% in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Nauru's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Nauru ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 15.7% | 13.8% | 1.9% | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 13.2% | 16.3% | 3.1% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products, Guinea-Bissau or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 16.0% against 15.0% in Guinea-Bissau as of 2021.
- What is the difference in tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products between Guinea-Bissau and Nauru?
- 1.0%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nauru?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Nauru rank globally for tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 25th and Nauru ranks 22nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Staff estimates, published as Tariff rate, applied, weighted mean, primary products (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Weighted mean applied tariff is the average of effectively applied rates weighted by the product import shares corresponding to each partner country. Data are classified using the Harmonized System of trade at the six- or eight-digit level. Tariff line data were matched to Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) revision 3 codes to define commodity groups and import weights. To the extent possible, specific rates have been converted to their ad valorem equivalent rates and have been included in the calculation of weighted mean tariffs. Import weights were calculated using the United Nations Statistics Division's Commodity Trade (Comtrade) database. Effectively applied tariff rates at the six- and eight-digit product level are averaged for products in each commodity group. When the effectively applied rate is unavailable, the most favored nation rate is used instead. Primary products are commodities classified in SITC revision 3 sections 0-4 plus division 68 (nonferrous metals).